🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. So there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.